A Lit Review provides your reader with a survey of the professional publications available on your topic. Then I read the Methods section very carefully. Finally, I am more inclined to review for journals with double-blind reviewing practices and journals that are run by academic societies, because those are both things that I want to support and encourage. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. Whereas the main body of a research paper focuses on the subject of your research, the Lit Review focuses on your sources.
It may provide background or history. For example, weave references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording. Literature reviews require you to critically evaluate the literature. Skilled writers can make you think their interpretations are facts. You might just go ahead and buy them or pitch the manufacturers and just ask for access. Another important piece of information you want is how information was gathered to determine things like statistics - especially population statistics. Keep the tone warm and lighthearted, and be sure to use the opportunity to build a stronger relationship with your customer.
Then, I divide the review in two sections with bullet points, first listing the most critical aspects that the authors must address to better demonstrate the quality and novelty of the paper and then more minor points such as misspelling and figure format. If the review is preliminary to your own thesis or research project, its purpose is to make an argument that will justify your proposed research. Can the article be used as evidence in your document? A is the original place in which the information can be found, or the first person to make that information available. My tone is one of trying to be constructive and helpful even though, of course, the authors might not agree with that characterization. I try to be as constructive as possible.
Such judgments have no place in the assessment of scientific quality, and they encourage publication bias from journals as well as bad practices from authors to produce attractive results by cherry picking. Determine how you want to talk about the product or service. Waiting another day always seems to improve the review. Develop a Working Thesis Write a one or two sentence statement summarizing the conclusion you have reached about the major trends and developments you see in the research that has been done on your subject. I'm critiquing the work, not the authors. The views expressed here are my own and may not reflect those of George Mason University.
I usually pay close attention to the use—and misuse—of frequentist statistics. If I find the paper especially interesting and even if I am going to recommend rejection , I tend to give a more detailed review because I want to encourage the authors to develop the paper or, maybe, to do a new paper along the lines suggested in the review. This will help you evaluate web resources. What are the benefits of using this kind of source? Just a brief overview in 1-2 sentences will suffice. What are some strategies for writing a good literature review? Problem formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues? If there is a major flaw or concern, I try to be honest and back it up with evidence. Writing a Fiction Book Review Note: You don't have to answer every question -- they're suggestions! Reviewing is a great learning experience and an exciting thing to do. On your own you need to think about the document itself.
Is there an angle the authors have overlooked? All materials on this site are the property of their authors and may not be reprinted without the author's written permission, unless otherwise indicated. Occasionally, there are difficulties with a potentially publishable article that I think I can't properly assess in half a day, in which case I will return the paper to the journal with an explanation and a suggestion for an expert who might be closer to that aspect of the research. As junior scientists develop their expertise and make names for themselves, they are increasingly likely to receive invitations to review research manuscripts. Specialized magazines may be more useful for example business magazines for management students , but usually magazines are not useful for your research except as a starting point by providing news or general information about new discoveries, policies, etc. I also try to cite a specific factual reason or some evidence for any major criticisms or suggestions that I make. Are the methods suitable to investigate the research question and test the hypotheses? You can use the various Who's Who publications for the U. Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem.
Overall, I try to make comments that would make the paper stronger. Or, does is merely add more of the same thing being said? This means that the writing should either be structured chronologically, thematically or methodologically. Go ahead, and start reviewing our product, making a solid profit. K21, shelved at the reference desk for a brief evaluative description. You cannot generalize information beyond the population that was used in the original research. In fact, if you don't express your gratitude, they might lose passion or motivation. Having said that, I tend to define my expertise fairly broadly for reviewing purposes.
Are they regularly cited by other authors in the field? If you wish you could change the ending, don't reveal it! I usually write rather lengthy reviews at the first round of the revision process, and these tend to get shorter as the manuscript then improves in quality. Does it forge a new path? For more information please contact Please read our new. How do you feel about it? Data from our stores shows that 7% of the people who click on these smart email upsells end up making another purchase. At the other extreme, some news sources on the Web now note the hour and minute that articles are posted on their site. It makes no sense to trick your audience into thinking that your product has no flaws.