The characters consist of two couples and a lawyer. The door of the cage is broken, as if it was pulled apart. Considered an example of early feminist literature, the story contrasts a woman's heightened perspective vs a man's lack of insight during a time women were often barely educated and possessed no political or economic power. She understands, however, the rage that someone feels when a beloved pet is killed, revealing that a boy killed her kitten right in front of her as a child and how much she had wanted to hurt that boy. What struck me most about this story was the women's decision that the accused was guilty even though there was no real evidence that she was. The story begins as Mrs. She had to adopt a life which was her husband's, and not her's at all.
However, when he explained that he had come over to their house to propose sharing a party line telephone, Minnie suddenly laughed, abruptly stopped, and looked sacred of Mr. A marvellous short story to finish my afternoon reading. In a moment of foreshadowing, the attorney mentions the possibility of the women finding a clue. The women struggle to decide where their loyalty rests and the fate of a fellow woman. The county attorney looks over the things that Mrs. She says that that too was a horrible crime: who is going to punish her for it? If anything they may have lost the independence that they once had, prior to getting married. Her mind was occupied with endless misery and resent.
Crying, she says that she should have known that something was amiss with the Wrights. Peters exclaims sadly that Minnie was worried about the possibility that her newly canned jars would burst in the cold weather. Wright, a trapped and abused woman, may have offed her husband. It was beautifully stitched by Minnie. Wright, she discovers a pretty little box.
Martha Hale being hurried along by her husband, Lewis Hale. Not only does Martha feel guilty about not maintaining a friendship with Minnie, but she's also vocal about how she knows how difficult women's work in the home can be. Susan Glaspell 1876-1948 was an American playwright, journalist, novelist and actress. Hale looks on nervously because she knows her husband is not very good at retelling stories. The men, passing through on their way to the barn, laugh when they overhear the women wonder whether Minnie was going to ''quilt it or just knot it. Glaspell originally wrote the story as a one-act play entitled for the Provincetown Players in 1916.
The distinct actions of each individual character is clearly explained in the plot, which also fluctuates leaving the reader on a roller coaster ride of suspense and curiosity. Peters, the sheriff s wife, some companionship. Peters discovers a quilt that Minnie Foster was making. Two women are dragged along with their husbands, a sheriff and a witness, to the scene of a murder. Needless to say, with the name of her husband also came the mighty responsibility to live up to the standard of the name. Again, the importance of evidence related to motive is highlighted by the overheard conversation of the men.
Wright's suffering when the only living thing around her has died. Hale observes that a few squares of the quilt are poorly sewn, as if Minnie was anxious or tired as she worked, and Mrs. While they do not know why Minnie was so nervous, they do believe that this evidence of nervousness is potentially dangerous for Minnie. Hale leaves cues of guilty feelings. Peters if she thinks that Mrs. . The use of the noose, despite the presence of the more reliable gun, suggests that there is a personal or emotional logic to the particulars of the murder.
A Jury of Her Peers was a very interesting and well constructed short story, but it was the undertones of social commentary on the position and sisterhood between women that made it a worth while read. And they decided to do something about it. Despite the serious circumstances, he delivers his story in a long-winded and poorly thought-out manner, tendencies he struggles to avoid throughout. She was a founding member of the Provincetown Players, one of the most important collaboratives in the development of modern drama in the United States. Another instance to be noted is a conversation between her and the young attorney. When he said he wanted to see John, she said he was dead.
Through Mrs Hale the reader discovers that Minnie lived her life, prior to marrying Wright, as she would have liked to have lived it. The county attorney comments, sarcastically, that at least they discovered that Mrs. The incredible cunning the women in the story demonstrate provides insight into the innate independence that women had even during days of deep sexual discrimination. This remark is jumped on. In A Jury of Her Peers by Susan Glaspell we have the theme of connection, inequality, independence, control and oppression. As the women continue to talk, Mrs. The men are determined to figure out things themselves, but the two ladies begin to find clues and piece together the solution.
Hale played a critical role in the fate of Mr. Peters frantically tries to shove the box in her purse. These women are connected by their gender and the oppressive social situation in which they live. Two women solve a mystery in the kitchen based on their intuition while men search for clues elsewhere. The vexing thing about this particular passage is that Mrs. Lesson Summary In ''A Jury of Her Peers,'', Minnie Wright has killed her husband. Susan Glaspell's A Jury of Her Peers is a battle of the sexes.